[Serious Phil] [serenityandtolerance] Do Women Suck? [1 Attachment]
greenbhanu at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 28 09:59:03 CST 2012
Religion and its Scripture)
PADMO : As you come
round to the fresh definition of religion and religiosity that would encompass
unforeseen welfare of femininity, the mystery of Ant and Elephant would be
resolved also. The term ‘godliness’ may not then really be quite necessary;
because optimal worldliness could suffice the best male-female coexistence
then. First, let us get hold of the Ant-Elephant analogy of this context.
There was an ant who wanted
to speak to the society of elephants about the current disharmony between male
elephants and female elephants. The ant was egalitarian and kindhearted and
there was no reason why the elephants of both genders wouldn’t listen to him.
But there was a species-wide inconsistency between the ant and the elephant -
making ant’s language inaudible and unintelligible.
An audio-mechanism probably could make the ant
surpass the first disability (of vocal pitch), but the second disability (of difference
in appearance) would still pose a problem. Of course, the third disability
pertaining to language (difference between languages of ant and elephant) would
also have to be overcome lastly.
This process would begin when the ant firstly
is able to attract the elephant towards itself and begins to communicate
interactively. What would solve the appearance gap is a piece of convex mirror.
Seeing the elephant-like image, the elephants would turn toward the ant in the
shadow to learn and be influenced and be benefitted immensely.
What is the morale of
A femininity-compassionate person is the ant
and all strata (mega-beings) of populace constitute the elephant folk
comprising of both sexes. This compassionate and egalitarian individual is
powerless without the audio-mechanism and the convex mirror in the first phase.
The audio-mechanism symbolizes formation of a growing organization of like-minded
people whose voices would add up to raise the pitch of desire enough to attract
attention of the mass. The convex mirror is akin to ritualism that will create
a benedictory image that would touch the heart of mass.
Lastly, the third impediment against
femininity in the form of lack of lingual juxtaposition (appropriate/ relevant
ideas and expressions) could be overcome through the discovery of doubt-transcending
problem-solving new reason.
If the entire task of woman welfare is encapsulated
into the singular form of ‘religion of femininity’ (woman religion), the
contextual/ relevant new reason will need to be ritualized and administered in
an organized manner. These three organs, viz. new reason, ritualism and
organization, of the mega-task of infinite welfare may not be ignored – in this
context, for the sake of womankind.
Taking ‘religiosity’ as the mega-task and ‘religion’
as its mega-contrivance, we can fix their working definitions. When ‘religiosity’
is the vision of boundless benediction and real welfare, ‘religion’ is the task-conducive
contrivance-triplet comprising of (a) new reason, (b) commensurable and minimal
and reversible/ changeable ritualism (c) growing organization of exponents and
Thus the femininity-promoting religiosity and religion
will be firstly sociological in nature and may or may not touch the level of
spirituality depending on the depth of welfare perceived and benediction sought.
So, can we think of a ‘woman religion’ that
can not be obviated in our way to achieve maximal woman welfare? If yes, we
must begin to appreciate the pivotal nature of new reason that will define
feminine existence and feminine metamorphosis.
It is time for reason-digging and
logic-mutating civil litterateurs to unite and write out its scripture, namely ‘Book
You may reply this thread upon http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/greenlogic/
or consign a copy to greenlogic at yahoogroups.co.in for extended discussions.
For discussion on gender concerns:
Group email: greenemotion at yahoogroups.co.in
From: Arhata Osho <arhataworldfreespeech at yahoo.co.uk>
To: Arhata <ArhataWorldFreeSpeech at yahoo.co.uk>; Arhata1 at gmail.com; 2011Arhata Dec. 25 <ArhataFreeSpeechDisplays at gmail.com>
Cc: PositiveThinkingAndMeditation at yahoogroups.com; Afghanistan_Today at yahoogroups.com; serenityandtolerance <Serenityandtolerance at yahoogroups.com>; Rampa theRamp6-27-11 <TheRampaPath at yahoogroups.com>; superconsciousness 7-31-08 <Superconsciousness at yahoogroups.com>; stillnotjustmusicanymore <Stillnotjustmusicanymore at yahoogroups.com>; Cybugle Cybugle1-19-11 <Thecybugle at yahoogroups.com>; ArubyX <Arubyrogers at yahoogroups.com>; ProJewishProZionistGroup at yahoogroups.com; spiritual_deism at yahoogroups.com; Anti_Hate_Pride_League at yahoogroups.com; House of Trolls 11-29-11 <House_Of_Trolls at yahoogroups.com>; GlobalRumblings 2-18-12 <Global_Rumblings at yahoogroups.com>; NewADem 2-17-12 <NewAmericanDemocrats at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 4:55 AM
Subject: [serenityandtolerance] Do Women Suck? [1 Attachment]
[Attachment(s) from Arhata Osho included below]
Do Women Suck?
February 24, 2012
Collectively, men suck horribly! The fruits of men are coming together in histories
most advanced age. Violence, war, and suppression of women! In the more educated countries with ‘freedom of religion’ (or not), some inroads have been made to respect a woman’s equality, and equal part in all decisions. However, for the most part men are still clones from the neanderthal ages hiding behind high tech toys, stimulants, and shallow inner brains as well as pseudo hearts that their brain pretends actually works. Scratch the surface and ‘voila’ - neanderthal lunk heads!
There is no question that women are, or have been lowered to prostitutes, baby machines, abuse receivers, and pets for man collectively. It’s a believed experience by millions that some women are ‘pieces of shit’, and could be as bad or worse than any man. That being said, it doesn’t obviate the fact that men in power are not doing what needs to be done to bring the individual and collective intelligence on a grand scale to an evolving height
that turns the planet into a light of consciousness for everyone.
I feel for the female plight as much and more as I’ve felt for ‘blacks’ dilemma, and yet like them, can see where a ‘significant’ population of them are, shall we say ‘uncomfortable’ to be around. It is no easy task to convey information to the ‘difficult types’ of any group, in fact it might be easier, and more hopeful, to wait for Santa Claus. There has to be an ‘intent’ with some action to learn to rise above one’s ‘unhappy’ position. Looking at just one’s immediate outer circumstances with little, or no attention to inner growth, or being open to studying information about the world’s problems (ie., keeping up with the news) is to be no more than a sheeple.
In the past, most women left ‘inner development’ to men (who collectively pay no attention), and being informed of what goes on in the world almost exclusively to men. WHAT A
DISASTER! Now, in the Western world, women are slowly waking up to see the world is out of control with violence everywhere, including against them and their innocence. Those majority of females who just raise families with their heads in the sand about the rest, are part of the global problem.
We can blame religions, politics and greed for the situation in the world, but upon closer look, it’s a lack of more sensitive, practical, informed female energy that is lacking. Few men, inspite of their collective accomplishments, are ‘mother trained’ to be conscious humans apart from being male or female. Women must get informed, resolve their issues, find inner harmony, and make a difference in the world. Now might be too late, but it’s a positive, logical start!! Remember, no high conscious male is looking for more in a female than your sensitivity, enthusiasm, and openness. Males should always give defferance to a female’s wishes. The male
ego is really insecure, and way overblown. Be the ‘godliness’ that seems to be so needed in the world! Pack up all your troubles and throw them away!
__._,_.___Attachment(s) from Arhata Osho
1 of 1 File(s)
Do Women Suck?.pdf
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Visit Your Group
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 450198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Philscimind