[Serious Phil] Wittgenstein Slides

[Peter D]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "seanwilsonorg" <ludwig.sean at ...> wrote:
>
> Stuart.
> 
> Way down in the jungle of the below message, you ask something to the effect of : why should the discussion becom naturally quieted, if it were merely an argument over aspect sight?
> 
> Here is why. Once the discussion becomes one of aspect sight, we are at the point when both sides know the same information. The only point then is for each to see the other's aspect ( to "get it"). 
>This could take some time, 

It could take the production of further clarifications and persuasion
as well. It almost always certainly would. What you have missed
is that when SWM says It's All A Matter of Seeing, he signals#
that he has given up on that process: he is snatching a stalemate
from the jaws of defeat.