[Serious Phil] Wittgenstein Slides

[Peter D]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "SWM" <Philscimind at ...> wrote:

> But you and I (at least) have no dispute on that, Sean. I recognize right out of the gate that the important issue here is one of how we think about (conceptualize) the subject of these discussions.

I recognise that "conceptualise" is ambiguous. Y9ou could disambiguate it, but you won't.

> More important is to find ways to get clear on these different usages 


How about answering the fucking questions?