[Serious Phil] Wittgenstein Slides
peterdjones at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 5 16:42:43 CDT 2012
--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "SWM" <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
> But you and I (at least) have no dispute on that, Sean. I recognize right out of the gate that the important issue here is one of how we think about (conceptualize) the subject of these discussions.
I recognise that "conceptualise" is ambiguous. Y9ou could disambiguate it, but you won't.
> More important is to find ways to get clear on these different usages
How about answering the fucking questions?
More information about the Philscimind