[Serious Phil] Wittgenstein Slides

[SWM]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "Peter D" <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
 
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "SWM" <Philscimind@> wrote:
> 
> > But you and I (at least) have no dispute on that, Sean. I recognize right out of the gate that the important issue here is one of how we think about (conceptualize) the subject of these discussions.
> 
> I recognise that "conceptualise" is ambiguous. Y9ou could disambiguate it, but you won't.
> 
> > More important is to find ways to get clear on these different usages 
> 
> 
> How about answering the fucking questions?
> 
> 
>

There's no answering your questions because they're intentionally designed to obscure, not to clarify.