[Serious Phil] A Wittgensteinian Critique of Wittgensteiniasm.

[larry_tapper_2]

Sean writes:

"...I will sit and discuss only with those who are attitudinally predisposed to want to be freed from their homes."


So Sean, how would you rate yourself in that category?

Larry





--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "seanwilsonorg" <ludwig.sean at ...> wrote:
>
> ... what are you referring to? Which claim? In any matter, you don't argue it; you explain it. Going further requires TEACHING. But if someone doesn't want or can't handle the medicine, why would I go about laboring for you? Of what value is it to explain my views to you. What do I get out of it?
> 
> You show no propensity to want to understand the issue. You are so insecure as to believe that Eray's or Stuart's position affects you in any way. It's like you think your very being is on the line. As if, if they win, you somehow turn into a pumpkin or something. And so you behave the whole way through like the English version of Charlie Brown. 
> 
> And the moment I try to free you of this charm, you get insecure in another direction, because you are more frightened that your Lady Jane (philosophy) will be besmirched in the process. 
> 
> What are you more scared of: an aspect sight that would render your very soul mechanized or non-existent, or the fact that your beloved and dear Lady Jane was put to bed years ago by the man who exposed the false charms that kept you arguing along, forever in a day.
> 
> I will sit and discuss only with those who are attitudinally predisposed to want to be freed from their homes.
> 
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "Peter D" <Philscimind@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am interested, but this is not the place to discuss anything, really.  It was set up as a stage for SWM's CR discussions since those were not welcome at the more important, religious site.
> > 
> > I find that disappointing, especially as Mr Dr Esq has given up arguing his version of the claim.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Philscimind mailing list
> Philscimind at ...
>