[Serious Phil] A Wittgensteinian Critique of Wittgensteiniasm.
walterhorn at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 9 11:49:07 CDT 2012
--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "seanwilsonorg" <ludwig.sean at ...> wrote:
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "walto" <Philscimind@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Putnam, Kripke et al did not, and could not, think at the level Wittgenstein did, and never produced anything that either he or I would agree damaged his central insights. All that you have said here is: I don't fully understand. The fact of how you characterize my views and the words you use shews this.
> > >
I don't know what Kripke you have read, but it's obvious that you have not understood "Naming and Necessity" at all. Witt's cluster theory of names is false.
More information about the Philscimind