[Serious Phil] A Wittgensteinian Critique of Wittgensteiniasm.

[walto]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "seanwilsonorg" <ludwig.sean at ...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "walto" <Philscimind@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 1. Putnam, Kripke et al did not, and could not, think at the level Wittgenstein did, and never produced anything that either he or I would agree damaged his central insights. All that you have said here is: I don't fully understand. The fact of how you characterize my views and the words you use shews this. 
> > > 


I don't know what Kripke you have read, but it's obvious that you have not understood "Naming and Necessity" at all.  Witt's cluster theory of names is false.

W