[Serious Phil] "chain hitting"

[seanwilsonorg]

Stuart ADJUDICATES. Learn your civics, Walter. Stuart is not the King, he's the Supreme Judge. And he cannot decide anything without proper due process. He must hear argument. Both sides present their case. Then he would rule. 

He won't let your funny petitions be heard either, as surely they are not serious enough to summon his Judicature. A Petition must be tiled so in the Re: section. It must provide evidence, as a complaint would. It must not make barren assertions. It must have its proof all right there, for the eyes to see. 

Go back and look at our proceeding against that one fellow.

So, if you want, file a petition, properly named, stating why chain hitting should be allowed in the archives under our constitution, and I will calendar it for community argument. After the argument is done, it will be submitted to Lord Mirsky for resolution by precedent, and placed in the annals of our common law. 

God save the Queen.      

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "walto" <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "seanwilsonorg" <whoooo26505@> wrote:
> >
> > That's a hit. Perhaps it could even be thought of as a reply to what is perceived of as a hit. All of that is fine. Now, if Walter throws a zinger on top of Larr's hit, which does nothing but say the same basic thing (the hit), it's removed to discourage chain hitting.
> 
> It is?  I thought Stuart makes these rules, not you.  I haven't heard him opine on this matter at all.
> 
> 
>  > 
> > Can't explain more, I'm at bob Evans on my way to work. I see this > is the retiree hour. We workers participate on a different  >schedule. 
> 
> Really?  I'm currently preparing to testify at an insurance rate hearing (a workcomp request for roughly $160 million premium increase).  What are you doing?
> 
> W
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Philscimind mailing list
> Philscimind at ...
>