[Serious Phil] What KA really says

[Peter D]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, Eray Ozkural <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Peter D
> <Philscimind at ...>wrote:
> 
> >
> > > Me, I'm always suspicious of arguments from ineffability.
> >
> > But ineffability is a feature of cosnc, and therefore part
> > of the explanandum. That's still true even if subjective experience
> > has no propostional content of its own.
> >
> >
> But if I crush your head with a hammer, your consciousness suddenly
> disperses, way too physical for something that's ineffable :)

Crashing non sequitur.
"Ineffable" doesn't mean "non physical".