[Serious Phil] What KA really says
peterdjones at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 15 15:34:53 CDT 2012
--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, Eray Ozkural <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Peter D
> <Philscimind at ...>wrote:
> > > Me, I'm always suspicious of arguments from ineffability.
> > But ineffability is a feature of cosnc, and therefore part
> > of the explanandum. That's still true even if subjective experience
> > has no propostional content of its own.
> But if I crush your head with a hammer, your consciousness suddenly
> disperses, way too physical for something that's ineffable :)
Crashing non sequitur.
"Ineffable" doesn't mean "non physical".
More information about the Philscimind