[Serious Phil] Not Good Enough

[Peter D]

--- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "SWM" <Philscimind at ...> wrote:
>
> --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "Peter D" <Philscimind@> wrote:
>  
> > --- In Phil-Sci-Mind at yahoogroups.com, "SWM" <Philscimind@> wrote:
> > >
> > 
> > > I've told you what I explicitly assert, that Chalmers is an ontological dualist and that that kind of dualism is a more inclusive brand than mere substance dualism 
> > 
> > 
> >  But it is not that Chalmers has a more inclusive kind dualism; it
> > is just that you are placing a vaguer description on him.
> > 
> > 
> >
> 
> A more general description that gets at the issue that matters -- which isn't whether we are talking about substances at the bottom of the universe's deck.
> 


Who said it was?